Codility tests let you screen candidates and assess technical skills in web developers, but that doesn’t mean they’re the right fit for everyone.
With the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics predicting a 17% growth in employment for coders and programmers by 2033, the ability to find not just a developer – but the best individual for your organization – is crucial for getting a leg up on the competition.
Fortunately, plenty of Codility alternatives are out there to help you make your next successful developer hire. Read on to discover why you should consider other options and find the best talent assessment platform to streamline your hiring process.
There’s no doubt that Codility is a well-established platform for skill evaluations in the tech industry. However, it has a few limitations that may make other options a better fit.
Let’s look at some of Codility’s drawbacks:
Manual library imports are required. There’s no automatic function, which costs you more time.
It can be challenging to create customized tests. Unlike other technical skill-testing platforms, you need to make your algorithms yourself, which also takes time.
There’s no visible/displayable timer for candidates. Candidates may rush through questions or answer them too slowly without knowing how much time they have left on their test.
Test questions might alienate some candidates. Since Codility assessment questions are essentially algorithm-based brainteasers, they may not accurately assess a candidate’s more practical, real-life coding skills.
They’re missing non-technical skill tests. Web developers need to know their tech, but that’s not all it takes to succeed in the role. Personality tests, cognitive assessments, and other soft skills are also crucial to finding someone who would fit the position and the company culture.
If any of these limitations have you second-guessing using a Codility test, keep reading and discover our reviews of Codility alternatives.
So, before we take a look at why an alternative to Codility might be better, here’s a quick comparison table that compares all of your available options:
Now, let’s take a closer look at these Codility competitors below.
Ready to find a better skills assessment platform to help you fill developer positions in your company?
Here are some of the best alternatives to Codility that you can use to evaluate candidate skills and hire the right individuals for your team.
Where Codility fails to offer a wide range of assessments, TestGorilla has plenty to offer in its test library. TestGorilla is a comprehensive skills testing platform that equips hiring managers and recruiters with the best tools to assess candidates and shortlist the best programmers and coders available.
One of the best things about TestGorilla’s platform is its outstanding user experience. Monitoring the results of your candidates’ tests is effortless and intuitive, as is creating custom coding questions. You can also integrate the platform with various applicant tracking systems, which makes applicant tracking easy.
In addition to critical features like one-way interviewing options, the platform offers a range of coding tests, from Python to C# coding tests. It also includes different types and levels (entry-level and intermediate) for each programming language test.
For example, here’s what a question from the TypeScript (Coding): Intermediate-Level Algorithms test looks like:
TestGorilla is the best alternative to Codility because it offers personality and soft skills tests in addition to technical ones, enabling you to get a comprehensive assessment of candidates. Here are some of the other tests that you may use to hire a well-rounded developer:
TestGorilla test | What does it measure? |
Java (Coding) Entry-Level Algorithms test | Basic programming skills in Java |
WordPress Developer test | Knowledge of and coding skills for WordPress |
Scala (Coding) Intermediate-Level Algorithms test | Understanding and programming of Scala |
Problem Solving test | Define and analyze problems and information to make decisions |
Attention to Detail (Textual) test | Focus on textual detail while processing information |
Culture Add test | How an applicant’s values and behaviors align with your company’s |
Since all tests are backed by subject-matter experts, even recruiters with no prior knowledge of a subject can confidently hire tech talent while avoiding hiring biases that emerge when test results aren’t the deciding factor. Take Lima Innovation Lab’s (LILAB) experience with TestGorilla, for example.
LILAB’s biggest hiring problem was its human resources managers' lack of technical knowledge. Unfortunately, this made screening potential candidates difficult and resulted in a high dismissal rate within the first three months of hiring.
Once it began to incorporate programming and personality tests from TestGorilla’s test library into its selection process, though, LILAB saw a significant difference. After six months, the company found it was retaining more than 90% of its hired candidates.
With the expenses associated with recruitment and retainment, organizations can save a lot of money using a platform like TestGorilla. See the difference it can make for your company using our recruitment ROI calculator.
Although TestGorilla provides its users with many excellent features, it may not have everything you need for your hiring process. You can’t conduct live video interviews or peer coding sessions within the platform to see how candidates work collaboratively.
However, if you don’t mind using other apps to fill these roles, TestGorilla is a solid choice as a comprehensive assessment tool for web developer skills.
TestGorilla Pros | TestGorilla Cons |
- Skills tests that are created and frequently improved by subject-matter experts - Customizable coding questions to test candidates’ knowledge - Anti-cheating features, such as copying and pasting prevention and webcam snapshots - Grading automation to save time and prevent human error - Customizable assessments to represent your brand | - No live peer coding - No live video interviews |
Pricing: Pricing starts from $75 per month, billed annually, with exact pricing based on your company size (measured by the number of FTEs). All paid plans come with unlimited active assessments and unlimited candidates.
Rating: 4.5/5, 1200+ reviews (G2)
With the option to create customized assessments in addition to its extensive library of 400+ soft and hard skill tests, TestGorilla gives you a comprehensive look at developer skill sets
Like TestGorilla, the DevSkiller talent assessment platform enables non-technical HR professionals and tech recruiters to conduct bias-free technical interviews online. Since unconscious biases can interfere with recruiting and retention efforts, finding ways to combat them can be critical to a successful hire.
What’s unique about the DevSkiller platform is its RealLifeTesting methodology, which ensures that the tests reflect the conditions under which your candidates would be working in the open position. It measures the real-world job performance and coding skills of your candidates.
With DevSkiller, you can quickly test candidates of different seniority levels and various job-specific skills for different developer roles. There are tests for everyone from software engineers to mobile developers and full-stack developers.
However, none of these assessments test for soft skills, which is one of the main reasons hiring managers look for Codility competitors in the first place. Plus, its quality control process isn’t as rigorous as similar platforms. TestGorilla assessments, for example, go through a 28-step process before being added to the test library.
Pros | Cons |
- Available in several different spoken languages - Coding exercise migration is possible - Candidate scores are calculated and ranked automatically - Tasks are ranked by difficulty level, as are candidates’ scores - Integrations with several HR tools and applicant tracking systems are available | - No specific soft skills tests - Quality control for tests isn’t as stringent as other platforms |
Pricing: Pricing starts from $3,600 per year.
Rating: 4.7/5, 90+ reviews (G2)
Artificial intelligence powers the iMocha platform. Live coding interview capabilities, assessments that you can customize, and proctoring features make iMocha a comprehensive and user-friendly technical skills testing platform.
You can use iMocha to validate skills and upskill existing employees by creating tailor-made training courses that help them develop their weaker skills.
iMocha’s AI-powered candidate metrics aid hiring managers and recruiters in making data-driven decisions.
Its extensive library is impressive, featuring more than 2000 skills tests. The platform also offers a few ATS integrations to make applicant monitoring easy.
However, like the other Codility alternatives on this list, iMocha has limitations. You can’t edit multiple tests simultaneously on the platform, which can be time-consuming. It also doesn’t have a Culture Add test to help you identify candidates that both fit with and add to your company culture.
Pros | Cons |
- Available in a vast range of spoken languages - A dashboard feature that provides an overview of candidates’ scores - Effortless exporting of assessment results - Adjustment of skills assessments’ difficulties - Proctoring and anti-cheating features | - No culture add test - Can’t always share/edit tests in bulk |
Pricing: iMocha’s prices are available upon request. They are customized to meet your recruitment needs, so your price may vary from another company’s. However, third parties report them starting at $1,800 per year.
Rating: 4.4/5, 250+ reviews (G2)
Detecting plagiarism in candidates’ code submissions is simple with HackerRank thanks to its proctoring controls, but that’s not all there is to like about this platform.
Unlike Codility, HackerRank offers coding tests of various difficulties to assess candidate skills at every level. Plus, every talent assessment has been field-tested and validated by studies.
Code submissions take place on an interactive platform that integrates an interviewer scorecard and enables interviewers to import the code submitted by applicants for separate tasks. Even live interviewing is possible with HackerRank.
Despite all of these great features, a few things are missing from HackerRank’s platform that may cause you to look at other options.
It has no cognitive ability tests, like a Critical Thinking test, which can give you insights into how candidates think. You can get an idea of what they know from their skills tests, but understanding candidate thought processes can help you determine if they’re the right fit for your team and the role.
HackerRank also lacks a candidate management feature, so you can’t track applications throughout the hiring process. Keeping candidate information organized from the test invitation to the job offer stage can help streamline the hiring process, making this feature a must-have for some hiring managers.
Pros | Cons |
- Several applicant tracking system integrations - There is a broad range of coding tests to choose from - Automatic scoring of candidates’ tests - The option to build your coding tests | - No cognitive ability tests - No candidate management feature |
Pricing: Pricing starts from $100 per month.
Rating: 4.7/5, 450+ reviews (G2)
With 78% of individuals reporting that companies who use game-like elements during recruitment make them more desirable, CoderPad is worth your consideration. The standout feature of this technical assessment platform is that it offers recruiters gamified technical candidate screening.
CoderPad lets you customize your questions effortlessly and choose from a broad selection of tests for different coding languages. You can also assign take-home projects to let candidates work independently, and the platform functions as an IDE to enable easy sharing of code between candidates and interviewers.
If you’re a non-technical recruiter, CoderPad is one option that makes recruitment simpler, more effective, and fun.
However, it's not the best talent assessment platform for everyone. It’s hard to gamify something like personality tests, so it's no surprise these are missing from CoderPad. Also, if you have a problem, the only way to contact their support team is through email, which can halt your hiring process if they don’t return your emails ASAP.
Pros | Cons |
- Offers a gamified candidate screening process - Conduct live interviews - Available in French and English - A selection of detailed coding tests that match real-world coding challenges - Video recording options to monitor the length of time candidates take to solve problems | - No personality tests - Customer support is only through email |
Pricing: CoderPad’s pricing starts from $70 per month.
Rating: 4.4/5, 230+ reviews (G2)
TestDome features more than 160 skill tests, all of which you can easily customize. They also offer a money-back guarantee if you find any answers to their skills tests online.
One of TestDome’s handy features is its test score automation. You don’t need to calculate scores manually, saving you time and helping you avoid human error when analyzing the performance of your candidates or making a candidate comparison.
Plus, their extensive test library enables you to assess various developer skills. Some programming languages and framework skills tests available on the TestDome platform include Ruby and PHP, just to name a few.
TestDome could benefit from a few extra features, though. It lacks 24/7 live support, which can disrupt your hiring process if you’re stuck waiting for a response. Like Codility, TestDome doesn’t offer personality tests, which can give hiring managers insights into how candidates may react in a developer role.
Pros | Cons |
- In-depth reports that break down the results into each technical skill - There are plenty of different options for ATS integrations - The ability to make comparisons between your benchmark/reference solution and candidates’ responses | - Lacks 24/7 live support - No personality tests |
Pricing: Pricing ranges from $100 to $4,200 for 5 to 600 candidates.
Rating: 4.6/5, 200+ reviews (G2)
Another Codility alternative is HackerEarth. Its vast selection of tools makes candidate assessment for technical roles easy. The platform’s tools, which include coding assessments for screening and a real-time coding editor for interviews, can also facilitate the upskilling of your current software developer employees.
Monitoring your developer candidates’ test results and applications is easy with HackerEarth’s hiring workflow. Simply use its integration feature to track the results as you receive them.
You can also create custom questions to test your candidates thoroughly. Or, if you’re a non-technical recruiter, choose from more than 13,000 questions and more than 80 skills tests to assess candidates (even if you have limited knowledge of the subject you’re testing).
Although HackerEarth has many technical questions and tests in its library, it’s unfortunately missing dedicated soft skills assessments, similar to Codility. On G2, users also report occasionally encountering technical issues like glitches during tests, which can result in a negative candidate experience. This is why we suggest looking at HackerEarth alternatives before signing up.
Pros | Cons |
- Share feedback with other recruiters in your organization - Integrate the platform and software with applicant tracking systems - Assess more than 41 different programming languages | - Overemphasis on coding skills - Occasional technical issues |
Pricing: HackerEarth’s pricing starts from $209 per month.
Rating: 4.5/5, 330+ reviews (G2)
From planning your assessments to screening your candidates and preparing for interviews, Mercer Mettl is a quality platform that covers all the bases of skills-based hiring for developers, including psychometric, aptitude, and coding assessments.
If you’re a part of the 73% of organizations that feel responsible for developing their employees, Mercer Mettl may be a great match. Upskilling your organization’s workforce is simple with this platform.
First, you can use a technical skills test to determine your employees’ weaker skill sets. Then, use the data to create an in-depth training program that addresses these skills.
Unique to Mercer Mettl is their gamified online hackathon that features a leaderboard and can be used by recruiters and hiring managers to create a more engaging onboarding process. You can’t get this with a Codility online assessment test!
There’s a lot to like about Mercer Mettl, but it does share similar limitations to a few of the other platforms on our list. Not only is it missing a culture add test to see if candidates can align with and enhance your company culture, but there’s also no pricing information on its website. Personalized pricing is nice, but so is transparency.
Pros | Cons |
- Available in a wide selection of spoken languages, including English, Spanish, Russian, and Chinese - Proctoring features ensure candidates don’t cheat when completing assessments - Includes an option to sort between graded and non-graded candidates - Test types cover psychometric, aptitude, and coding evaluations | - No culture add test - There is no pricing information on the website |
Pricing: Prices are available upon request. However, third parties report them starting at $249 per month.
Rating: 4.4/5, 500+ reviews (G2)
Read our comprehensive guide to compare the top talent assessment tools on the market.
From front-end to back-end, mobile to DevOps, databases, and other IT technical skills tests, Adaface offers a broad selection of assessments. The platform features more than 500 skill tests covering programming, cognitive ability, typing, and more.
Several specific programming skills tests are available on Adaface, including tests for everything from Python to JavaScript. You can also test framework knowledge with skill tests for Spring, React, and more.
Although it does feature an extensive test library, there are a few downsides to Adaface, especially regarding pricing. First, there is no free plan. If you opt for the free trial, you must pay for credits to continue using the service. And you better use those credits within a year – they expire after that.
Pros | Cons |
- The chatbot feature helps you save time when screening applicants - Custom tests are available in addition to Adaface’s 40 different programming tests - It includes a recommended pass/fail benchmark and comprehensive reports to facilitate decision-making - No trick questions in assessments | - No free plan - Credits expire |
Pricing: Adaface’s pricing starts from $180 per year.
Rating: 4.6/5, 40+ reviews (G2)
Using a mix of personality, cognitive ability, and technical assessments can give you a more complete picture of candidate skill sets. Sign up for a Free forever account to elevate your hiring game today.
This list only scratches the surface of the many skills testing platforms available, and new startups are popping up every day. Here are a few that didn’t quite make the cut but are still worth considering:
Filtered: With integrations through GitHub, Bitbucket, or GitLab, Filtered has an outstanding authentication process to ensure every applicant is exactly who they say they are.
CodeSignal: CodeSignal is built from the top down for high-volume hiring, so it’s worth considering if you plan on pre-screening many candidates at once, such as through university hiring.
Testlify: Although it’s on the higher end of platforms pricing-wise, that’s primarily because of the quantity and variety of add-ons Testlify has available, such as API key access, analytics, and even the ability to test candidates under a white label.
As you can see, there’s a broad range of Codility alternatives to help you find the best developer for your team. Although this might mean that you’ve got a difficult choice to make, keep in mind that some of the ideal features of a technical skills testing platform are:
Anti-cheating or proctoring features
ATS integrations
Video interviewing capabilities
A large selection of hard and soft skills tests
Customizable tests to match your brand
Custom coding questions
Fortunately, you can get all this and more with TestGorilla, making it the best alternative to Codility assessment tests. With options ranging from the Django test to the Windows Server Administration test, making skills-based hiring decisions is easy for any role.
Check out the TestGorilla demo today to see it in action.
Are you interested in creating your own assessment? See how easy it is in our product tour.
When you’re ready to start optimizing your recruitment process, sign up for a Free forever plan.
Do you need a little more information on Codility? Check out our answers to the most frequently asked questions below.
Equivalents of Codility include platforms such as TestGorilla, DevSkiller, iMocha, HackerRank, CodinGame, TestDome, HackerEarth, Mercer Mettl, and Adaface. To find the best skills-testing platform for your needs, you should consider factors such as the skills you want to test, the number of candidates you need it for, and ease of use for both interviewers and candidates.
Codility tests can be tough. Codility assigns difficulty levels from Elementary to Very Hard, but the toughness of the test depends on the person. Since Codility assessment questions are like algorithm-based brainteasers, people who are good at solving puzzles may have an easier time with them. Check out Codility alternatives if you want a different approach to skills-based testing.
Why not try TestGorilla for free, and see what happens when you put skills first.
Biweekly updates. No spam. Unsubscribe any time.
Our screening tests identify the best candidates and make your hiring decisions faster, easier, and bias-free.
This handbook provides actionable insights, use cases, data, and tools to help you implement skills-based hiring for optimal success
A comprehensive guide packed with detailed strategies, timelines, and best practices — to help you build a seamless onboarding plan.
A comprehensive guide with in-depth comparisons, key features, and pricing details to help you choose the best talent assessment platform.
This in-depth guide includes tools, metrics, and a step-by-step plan for tracking and boosting your recruitment ROI.
A step-by-step blueprint that will help you maximize the benefits of skills-based hiring from faster time-to-hire to improved employee retention.
With our onboarding email templates, you'll reduce first-day jitters, boost confidence, and create a seamless experience for your new hires.
Get all the essentials of HR in one place! This cheat sheet covers KPIs, roles, talent acquisition, compliance, performance management, and more to boost your HR expertise.
Onboarding employees can be a challenge. This checklist provides detailed best practices broken down by days, weeks, and months after joining.
Track all the critical calculations that contribute to your recruitment process and find out how to optimize them with this cheat sheet.